OPM Seal U.S. Office of Personnel Management

FY 2000
Budget Justification/Performance Plan


(Executive Resources continued)

Additional Information Available on the Next Page Next Page
ER Goal 1:
FY 1999/ FY 2000
By the end of FY 2000, needed changes in all significant OPM program policies are identified and changes are introduced so that Federal agencies are better equipped to respond to changing human resources and agency needs in the 21st century.
Means Blue Arrow Head  In FY 1999 and 2000, in partnership with its stakeholders, ER will proceed with legislative and administrative initiatives identified during the 1998 review. The Senior Executive Service and other senior personnel systems (e.g., Senior Level and Scientific and Professional) will be modified to improve how the Federal government develops, selects, assigns and manages its senior employees. Changes will strike a balance among management flexibility, employee protections, and larger corporate interests of Government. Key initiatives include:

Staffing: 1) propose regulations for delegation of Qualifications Review Board while focusing on the importance of leadership skills and ensuring that merit system protections are in place; and 2) propose statutory and regulatory revisions which give agencies more flexibility in making short-term appointments while ensuring that merit system protections are in place.

Performance Management: 1) propose statutory revision to abolish the 3-year recertification process; and 2) simplify regulations to increase flexibility, focus on results over process, promote alignment with GPRA and allow consideration of customer and employee satisfaction measures.

Blue Arrow Head  Complete a survey to gather information on SES members’ perceptions and attitudes about their Federal leadership experience, including the extent to which they function in ways consistent with the executive core qualifications, focus on outcomes rather than process, and believe the SES system supports program results. The study will be used to evaluate whether SES system modifications achieve the intended results in the view of those who both use and operate within the SES systems. Significant findings may confirm that modifications are effective or be used to fine tune strategies.
Blue Arrow Head  Continuing study of trends and advances in management practice in all sectors, e.g., public, private, non-profit, international, as reflected in periodicals, books, studies, conferences and other means of disseminating information and continuing examination of trends and issues emerging in day to day SES Operations and Services work. Findings are used in developing or refining proposals for change or fine tuning implementation of changes in SES and other executive personnel systems.
Blue Arrow Head  Work with other OPM services, including the Office of Merit Systems Oversight and Effectiveness, to identify statutes, executive orders, regulations and policies in need of review in the area of executive resources management to support and facilitate high performance in federal agencies.
    
Indicators/Performance Results Blue Arrow Head   Baseline established for determining senior executives’ satisfaction with OPM’s leadership of SES program and their sense of "ownership" in the system.

1998 marked the 20th anniversary of enactment of the Senior Executive Service, and ER initiated a review of what had and had not worked over the years, and whether changes in the way we develop, select, and manage senior executives are necessary as we approach the 21st century. A Framework for Improving the Senior Executive Service was issued in April. This framework served as the focal point for stimulating debate and building consensus about needed system improvements, and developing a strategy for pursuing widely-supported legislative and administrative reforms.

Blue Arrow Head   Increased levels of satisfaction among HR Directors and those HR Specialists having executive resources functions with ER’s executive resources policy leadership and with their opportunities for involvement in the policy process, as measured by informal customer feedback and by a 2% increase in favorable ratings on OPM’s FY 1999 customer satisfaction survey for those survey items responsive to this goal.

Baseline satisfaction levels reported on the FY 1998 survey were as follows:

HR Directors: Policy Leadership Involvement
SES/Executive Resources (Overall) 70% 82%
Draft SES Framework 62% 69%
  

HR Specialists
(Executive Resources):

Policy Leadership Involvement
Draft SES Framework 65% 72%

 

Blue Arrow Head  In FY 1999, ER will use its new survey of SES members to develop a baseline of information on their perceptions and attitudes about their Federal leadership experience, including the extent to which they function in ways consistent with the executive core qualifications, focus on outcomes rather than process and find that the SES system supports their efforts to achieve program results.

Additional Information Available on the Next Page

Previous PageNext Page



Web Page Created 14 May 1999