Click here to skip navigation
OPM.gov Home  |  Subject Index  |  Important Links  |  Contact Us  |  Help

U.S. Office of Personnel Management - Ensuring the Federal Government has an effective civilian workforce

Advanced Search

Federal Employees Health Benefits Program

FEHB Program Carrier Letter



Community-Rated Carriers


U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Insurance Services Programs

Letter No. 2005-08

Date: March 30, 2005

     Fee-for-service [7]   Experience-rated HMO [8]   Community-rated HMO [7]

SUBJECT: Carrier Responsibilities - Reconsideration Process and Medical Necessity Determinations

This letter clarifies and expands upon earlier OPM letters concerning the type of medical/clinical records OPM requires for inclusion in a Reconsideration File, upon which a Carrier bases its reconsideration decision. Specifically, this letter addresses denied claims that involve determination of medical necessity.

OPM has previously sent Carriers two FEHB Program Letters addressing the overall reconsideration process and outlining procedures that ensure reconsideration decisions have undergone a thorough review before issuance (Copies of these letters are attached for your review and reference):

  • On March 25, 1996, OPM sent Program Letter No. 96-16 - Carrier Responsibilities in Disputed Claims Process. This letter addresses the types of medical records applicable to the Carriers' reconsideration process.
  • July 22, 1997, OPM sent Program Letter No. 97-30 - Disputed Claims and the Carriers' Reconsideration Files. This letter addresses the documentation responsibility of Carriers.

In addition, these two Program Letters outline the documents required for the Reconsideration File. These documents adequately authenticate the information a Carrier used in reaching a reconsideration decision. When an enrollee submits a disputed claim inquiry, Carriers must ensure that the Reconsideration File contains all the documentation required by OPM.

When a member's Reconsideration File lacks the applicable medical records, the Carrier's reconsideration review process is called into question. What information did the Carrier use to base the denial of benefits? The lack of necessary medical documentation in a Reconsideration File requires OPM to request additional clinical information through the member. This ultimately delays OPM's decision; adds an additional burden on the member and medical care providers to obtain and forward the additional medical records; and increases the administrative workload of OPM staff.

Relevant medical record documentation can vary on a case-by-case basis. However, as a general rule for all claims involving determination of medical necessity, the Reconsideration File must contain, at a minimum, and as appropriate the medical/clinical records identified in the table below.

Minimum Medical/Clinical Records Required

Source of Service

Type of Medical/Clinical Records

Primary care/family physician

History and physical exam, reports of diagnostic studies associated with evaluation of the condition/symptoms; and office notes for a period of 18 months prior to the date(s) of service under dispute or date of pre-authorization denial.

Specialists

Initial evaluation, reports of diagnostic studies associated with evaluation of the condition/symptoms; and office notes from initial date of service (or 18 months prior) to date of service denied or date of pre-authorization denial.

Pathology

Pathology reports for all surgical procedures, including abortions.

Physical therapy

Initial and interim evaluations, session notes, and discharge evaluation; for any condition for which physical therapy would be considered an appropriate/alternative treatment modality for the service requested, e.g. breast reduction; prosthesis.

Occupational therapy

Evaluation/assessment, e.g., prosthetic device.

Others

Determined on a case-by-case basis.

For illustrative purposes, the following table includes some example procedures along with the types of medical/clinical records to be included as part of the Reconsideration File. This is not an exhaustive list of examples or applicable medical/clinical records.

Illustrative Examples

Example Procedure

Type of Medical/Clinical Records

Breast Reduction/ Abdominoplasty

Primary care/family physician, dermatology, orthopedics, gynecology, plastic or general surgery, chiropractic services, mammograms for two previous years, original pre-surgical photographs, and surgical and pathology reports.

Abortion

Primary care/family physician, obstetrician/gynecology, genetic counseling, surgical and pathology reports.

Residential treatment center (RTC)/facility

Primary care/family (pediatric) physician, complete medical records from RTC from date of admission, complete medical record from previous acute care hospitalization (if associated with transfer to RTC) or discharge summary, records associated with outpatient therapy rendered over prior two years (initial evaluation, session notes, treatment plan, discharge evaluation).

Medical/Surgical Admissions (length of stay determination)

Complete hospital medical record (from admission through discharge, including discharge summary)

Ambulance

Ambulance transport log(s) and associated Emergency Department record.

CPT Coding

Clinical records (e.g., office notes) and/or operative/procedure report for date(s) of service in dispute.

Others

Determined on a case-by-case basis.

When applicable, original pre-surgical photographs should be requested by the Carrier and kept on file at the Plan for not less than 120 days from the date of the reconsideration decision letter (following a disputed claim inquiry to OPM). In situations where a Carrier sustains its denial upon reconsideration, OPM expects the Carrier's written decision letter to the enrollee to be clear and concise; include rationale that adequately explains to the enrollee why the initial claim denial was correct; and explain the supporting contractual basis for denial.

When forwarding Reconsideration Files, Carriers need to separate the submitted documents into two sections - medical records and nonmedical records. This will facilitate OPM's review of Carrier Reconsideration Files. OPM will rely on the Carriers to identify these two sections when submitting Reconsideration Files.

OPM believes these procedures, added to the guidance in Program Letters Nos. 96-16 and 97-30, will enhance both the reconsideration and disputed claim processes and improve the service Carriers and OPM give to enrollees.

Sincerely,



Frank D. Titus
Assistant Director
For Insurance Services Programs

 


Attachment 1- Carrier Responsibilities in Disputed Claims Process PDF File Icon
Attachment 2 - Disputed Claims and the Carriers' Reconsideration Files PDF File Icon
Download this Letter as a PDF File PDF File Icon
Back to Carrier Letters
Get Acrobat Icon