NETL’s Performance Management and Awards System
Ellen Harris Baliker
Human Resources Division
Strategic Compensation Conference 2002
August 27, 2002
NETL PMAS Process
[This slide is divided into three sections.]
Section 1:
[There is a picture of a target.]
Goal Setting
- January-March:Institutional Plans
- April-beginning of May:Annual Operating Plans
- May:Individual Work Goals
- November-December:Mid-year updates of plans and goals
Section 2:
[There is a picture of a basketball player.]
Performance Measurement
- July:1st quarter high-level metrics summary
- October:2nd quarter high-level metrics summary
- November-December:Individual Work Goal progress review
- January:3rd quarter high-level metrics summary
- April-May:Individuals’ 360 feedback reports
- May-June:Divisional OPA Scorecards
Section 3:
[There is a picture of fireworks.]
Rewarding for Results
- October-November:Employee Survey
- December-January:PMAC recommendations to LMPC
- April:Revised PMAS approved
- July:Award pools decided by Director
- July-March:Special recognition awards
- May-June:QSI nominations and awards
- July:OPA approvals and awards
National Energy Technology Laboratory
- One of DOE’s 17 national labs
- Government owned / operated
- Sites in:
- Pennsylvania
- West Virginia
- Oklahoma
- Alaska
- More than 1,100 federal and support contractor employees
Our Mission
- Resolve the environmental, supply, and reliability constraints of producing
and using fossil resources
- Support development and deployment of environmental technologies to remediate
DOE’s weapons complex
What We Do
- Shape, fund, and manage extramural RD&D
- Conduct onsite research
- Support energy policy development
Shape, Fund, and Manage Extramural RD&D
- 1,100 research activities in all 50 states and several foreign countries
- Total award value $6.6 billion
- Private sector cost-sharing of $2.2 billion
- Leverages DOE funding
- Ensures relevance
- Accomplishes missionthrough commercialization
Number of Projects
- Industry - 468
- Academia - 262
- Not for Profit Labs - 117
- National Labs - 125
- Other - 53
A Well-Trained Workforce
| |
Other |
B.S. |
M.S. |
Ph.D. |
| Contractor |
314
|
142
|
65
|
21
|
| Federal |
135
|
175
|
176
|
110
|
| |
Other |
Professional |
Administrative |
Technical |
Engineers |
Scientists |
| Contractor |
82
|
109
|
50
|
195
|
74
|
32
|
| Federal |
23
|
65
|
117
|
66
|
204
|
121
|
New Challenges, New Opportunities
[There is a graphic of people having a conference and a professional looking
through a microscope.]
METC logo & PETC logo points to the FETC logo. The FETC logo points to
the NETL logo.
The Journey
- In 1993, part of our organization, implemented a formal 360 feedback system
with the five-level performance system
- This system was designed by a process improvement team during the TQM initiative
- This process improvement team became thePerformance Management and Award
Committee (PMAC) which oversees performance management and award policy
- The PMAC is sponsored by the Labor Management Partnership Council (LMPC)
Performance Management and Award Committee (PMAC)
John Augustine, Contract Specialist, Office of Business & Logistics
Ellen Harris Baliker, Human Resources Specialist, Office of Business & Logistics
Gary Covatch, Project Manager, Office of Project Management
Jan Hogler, Director Financial Management Division, Office of Business & Logistics
Rich Killmeyer, Research Scientist, Office of Science & Technology
Dale Schmidt, Technical Advisor, Office of Strategic Center for Natural Gas
Advisor:
Donna Tamilia, Human Resources Specialist
Sponsors:
Larry Kisner, Union President, AFGE Local 1995, Office of Science & Technology
Ann Dunlap, Paralegal Specialist, Office of Chief Counsel
Design and Implementation
- Merger of the two centers motivated a much-needed improvement in cross-organizational
teaming
- The PMAC pioneered an employee-driven Team Award
- In September 1995, NETL was one of the first organizations to implement
a pass/fail rating system with 360 degree feedback
Revolution in Accountability
- NETL has shifted its focus to the challenges of the Government Performance
and Results Act (GPRA)
- Establish accountability at the employee level
- Measure results achieved not only in programmatic responsibility but also
key administrative requirements
- Establish an operating plan scorecard
- Spotlight link between employee and productivity
Organizational Success
- Performance Incentive Leadership
- Results
NETLs PMAS
- Goal setting
- Performance measurement
- Rewarding results
An Integrated Planning Process
In the center of the slide, there is a graphic of a pyramid that includes the following labels:
- Work Goals of Individuals
- Operations Plans and Product Plans
- Institutional Plan and Business Plan
Outside of the pyramid, there are two labels that connect with double-sided arrows.
Align Employee Performance with
Strategic Goals
- Improve the link between individual performance and organizational results
- NETL has a schedule for cascading from Institutional and Business Plans,
to Office Operation Plans, to Division Operation Plans
- Employees must align their Individual Work Goals (IWG) with these formal
Plans
Align Employee Performance with
Strategic Goals
- Each Individual Work Goals (IWG) will identify the primary stakeholder (leader,
sponsor, manager, supervisor, etc.)
- Employees must choose 1-5 IWGs, with a minimum of two different stakeholders;
supervisors will be on the rating team whether they are a stakeholder or not
Elements and Standards
- Element 1 – JOB PERFORMANCE
- Achievement of Work Results
- Quality of Work Results
- Responsibility and Accountability
- Integrated Safety Management
Elements and Standards
- Element 2 – ORGANIZATIONAL VALUES
- Focus on Stakeholders
- Commitment to NETL Excellence
- Working Together
Elements and Standards
- Element 3 – INTERPERSONAL SKILLS
- Professionalism
- Communication
Elements and Standards
- Element 4 (SUPV. ONLY) – SUPERVISORY RESPONSIBILITY/LEADERSHIP
Performance Measurement
- In 2002, NETL changed from a formal software-driven 360-feedback system
to an informal feedback system
- Uses the back of the work goal form to gather feedback at the individual
level
High-Level Metrics
- Performance measurement parameter are incorporated into a "dashboard" to
improve focus on the most critical performance trends
- The instrument panel is used for steering the organization
- Green indicates expectations are being met
- Yellow raises caution
- Red triggers management attention
Performance Measurement
"Dashboard" Improves Focus on Most Critical Performance Trends
Customer Satisfaction (Yellow)
- Funding (Green)
- Information Products (Red)
Investment Results (Green)
- DOE/OMB Scorecard (Green)
- GPRA/Joule Performance (Yellow)
- Public Benefits (Red)
Human and Physical Resources (Yellow)
- Safety (Green)
- Employees (Red)
- Infrastructure (Yellow)
- Assessments and Surveys (Yellow)
Organizational Effectiveness
- Strategic Focus (Yellow)
- Projects (Green)
- Science and Technology (Red)
- Cost Control (Yellow)
Organizational Performance Report
- Year-end results of Organization’s performance towards set metrics
- Documentation used by AD to determine if metric was met or not
- The report:
- Documents how metrics were met
- Allows organizations to present extenuating circumstances which precluded
them from meeting a metric
- Compilation of required quarterly reports from Intranet
Rewarding for Results
- Organizational Performance Award
- Special Recognition Award
- Time Off Award
- Quality Step Increase
Summary
- NETL PMAS features:
- Balance, simplicity, flexibility, fairness, inclusiveness, opportunity,
defined roles
- Resulted in:
- Improved goal setting and accomplishment, organizational discipline,
employee satisfaction, accountability, tangible rewards
- "THAT WHICH GETS MEASURED, GETS DONE!"