NASAS STRATEGIC PLAN
HUMAN CAPITAL ARCHITECTURE
PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS
Understand the "architecture" and "pillars" concepts
What do we do with that information?
The NASA Senior Executive Team established guidelines:
AGENCY STRATEGIES:
What are we trying to accomplish relative to strategic intent, environmental drivers, customers, etc? What is the core of our work?
CAPABILITIES: What are the capabilities we require?
STRATEGIC ALIGNMENTHow do we link HR strategies to mission objectives? |
STRATEGIC COMPETENCIESHow do we make sure we acquire the competencies required to accomplish
our strategy? |
LEARNINGHow effectively and efficiently are we managing knowledge? |
PERFORMANCE CULTUREHow do we develop, reward and retain high performers? |
|
LEADERSHIP: Given our strategy, what does NASA leadership
look like? How do we assess it? Is it the appropriate investment?
|
|||
| SRR |
How do we manage these transformations while maintaining mission performance? How do we assure we dont lose critical skills during a period of uncertainty? How can we assure we can acquire, retain, and train people with the core competencies well need in the future (including pipeline)? How do we ensure essential knowledge management and leadership continuity in the face of potential retirements and other losses? Are there any guiding principles the team should use in its deliberations? What should our management philosophy be with respect to how we treat our workforce? |
| NGO | |
| Competitive Sourcing (including Shuttle) | |
| Improved Financial Performance | |
| Expanded Electronic Government | |
| Budget and Performance Integration | |
| Other? |
| STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT PILLAR | What kinds of things are we doing now that contribute
to maintaining a strong workforce (Agency and Centers)?
What else should we be doing? |
| STRATEGIC COMPETENCIES PILLAR | |
| LEADERSHIP FOUNDATION | |
| PERFORMANCE CULTURE PILLAR | |
| LEARNING PILLAR |
Defined as
Align human capital policies to support the accomplishment of the Agency's mission,
vision, goals and strategies (which define its direction and its expectations
for itself and its people).
GOALS:
SA 1.1 Link HR Strategies to Agency mission objectives
SA 1.2 NASA well-structured to support mission
SA 1.3 Employees understand organization plans
IF WE HAVE STRATEGIC ALIGNMENT, THEN WHAT DOES NASA's HUMAN CAPITAL LOOK LIKE?
Defined as
Recruit, hire, develop and retain employees with the strategic competencies
for mission critical occupations.
GOALS:
SC 2.1 Achieve desired competency levels in mission-critical jobs (matching
the right people to the right jobs at the right time)
SC 2.2 Achieve recruitment and retention rate for employees with strategic competencies
SC 2.3 Acquire quality new hires
IF WE HAVE STRATEGIC COMPETENCIES, THEN WHAT DOES NASA'S HUMAN CAPITAL LOOK LIKE?
Defined as
Ensure leadership in the Agency inspires, motivates and guides others towards
goals; coaches, mentors, challenges staff; adapts leadership styles to various
situations; models high standards of honesty, integrity, trust, openness, and
respect for individuals by applying these values
GOALS:
LDR 3.1 Recruit, develop, retain high-performing leaders
LDR 3.2 Leaders generate high levels of motivation and commitment
LDR 3.3 Maintain high standards of honesty and integrity
LDR 3.4 Foster equal opportunity principles in all NASA does
IF WE HAVE LEADERSHIP, THEN WHAT DOES NASA'S HUMAN CAPITAL LOOK LIKE?
Defined as
Create a culture that motivates employees for high performance, based on their
contribution to the work of the organization, and common values while ensuring
fairness in the workplace.
GOALS:
PC 4.1 Values diversity
PC 4.2 Develop, reward, retain high performers
PC 4.3 Deal with poor performers
PC 4.4 Employees focused on results
IF WE HAVE A PERFORMANCE CULTURE, THEN WHAT DOES NASA'S HUMAN CAPITAL LOOK LIKE?
Defined as
Promote knowledge-sharing culture and a climate of openness; promote continuous
learning and improvement
GOALS:
LRN 5.1 Knowledge management strategies in place
LRN 5.2 Training investment is strategic
LRN 5.3 Learning culture exists
IF WE HAVE A LEARNING CULTURE, THEN WHAT DOES NASA'S HUMAN CAPITAL LOOK LIKE?
| Pillar | Goal/Attribute/What's it look like? | Are we addressing it effectively? (Y/N) | Should we be doing more? (Y/N) | If the answer is"YES", prioritize top 5 "YES" items | For the top 5 "YES" items, suggest strategies for improvement | If the answer is "NO", briefly state why. |
| Strategic Alignment | 1. Employees understand how what they and their orgs do contributes to overall Agency goals. | |||||
| Definition: Align human capital policies to support the accomplishment of the Agencys mission, vision, goals and strategies (which define its direction and its expectations for itself and its people). | 2. Agency is well structured to support its mission in an effective and efficient way. | |||||
| 3. HR activities clearly, effectively and efficiently support and enable the agency's mission. |
DELIVER RESULTS!
| TARGET | FOCUS | EXAMPLES |
|---|---|---|
| NASA ADMINISTRATOR TO OUTSIDE ENTITIES |
RESPONSE TO EXTERNAL REQS
|
NASA's progress in closing gaps in critical competencies. Alignment of NASA's human capital strategy with its mission, goals, and organizational objectives. |
| AA FOR HR & ED | OUTCOMES FROM SPECIFIC INITIATIVES |
|
| PROJECT LEVEL | PROJECT SPECIFIC DELIVERABLES /PRODUCTS/ MILESTONES |
OMB AGREEMENT MILESTONES |
| Activities | Schedule | Metrics |
|---|---|---|
| *Complete Competency pilot at KSC | June 30, 2002 | Pilot complete and lessons learned captured and disseminated. |
| *Develop an Agencywide competency dictionary. | July 30, 2002 | Dictionary Completed |
| *Identify critical competencies across the Agency; those at risk, and potential skill mix adjustments between Centers. | November 30, 2002 | NASA knows what its strategic competencies and gaps are, by Sep 03. |
| *Complete rollout of KSC competency model Agencywide and resolve gaps and surplus competencies in mission critical occupations (utilizing HC tools, flexibilities, the Agency Competitive Sourcing Plan, etc.) | September 30, 2003 | NASA CMS Utilized by management to make decisions on hiring, reassignment, training and development, competitive sourcing (Check off, Management survey, OMB, OPM scorecards) |
| Identify imbalances in current and projected workforce of today, relative to what is needed for the future (oversupply/undersupply of key skills) | ||
| Integrate CMS into Agency-level Workforce planning and analysis tool. | September 30, 2003 | 100% of NASA Critical Competencies are defined |
| NASA CMS content integrated in IFMP/Core HR SAP | September 30, 2005 | Less than 10% of current year gaps remain after first year of system use (Improvement measure, CMS provided) |
| Communication Activity | Purpose | Audience | Presenter |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overview to Executive Council members | Obtain buy-in on concepts and content of SHCP | Individual Council Members | Member's of SHCP Team COMPLETE |
| Executive Council Roll-out | Roll-out and obtain Senior Management approval for implementation | Executive Management Council | V. Novak COMPLETE |
| Road-Show | Adequately capture message and intent of SHCP and share with all appropriate parties | Internal and external stakeholders, partners, interested parties. | Member's of SHCP Team COMPLETE TO OMB AND OPM AS DRAFT |
| Center Director Roll-out | Roll-out and confirm commitment to implementation of SHCP | Center Director's | CD's on SHCP Team/NOVAK |
| HR Director Council/Steering Committee Roll-out | Roll-out and obtain buy-in and commitment from HR Directors | HR Director's | Member's of SHCP Team/NOVAK/PETERSON |
| Tasking implementers | Thoroughly communicate intent of tactics and strategies to implementing orgs/individuals | Assigned implementers | Member's of SHCP Team/NOVAK |
| Center Workforce Road Show | Brief each Center's senior management council and appropriate workforce representatives. | Center senior management councils and employees (where appropriate) | CD'S/HR DIRECTORS |