-
Duty of Fair Representation
-
§ 7114(a)(1): "An exclusive representative is responsible for representing the interests of all employees in the unit it represents without discrimination and without regard to labor organization membership." See NTEU v. FLRA, 800 F.2d 1165 (D.C. Cir. 1986), where the court held that the union's duty of fair representation is limited to matters as to which the union is the exclusive representative. Also see 28 FLRA No. 118, where FLRA said the following: "Where the union is acting as the exclusive representative of its unit members, we will continue to require that its activities be undertaken without discrimination and without regard to union membership under section 7114(a)(1). We will not, however, extend those statutory obligations to situations where the union is not acting as the exclusive representative . . . ." See 49 FLRA No. 71 for an example of a violation of this duty (members-only poll regarding seniority-based benefit system administered by union) and 46 FLRA No. 81 where FLRA found no violation because the nonmember employee against whom discipline was proposed had a right to have a representative of her own choice.
-
Duty To Bargain
-
Broadly conceived, it refers to both (1) the circumstances under which there is a duty to engage in bargaining (see, e.g., midterm bargaining) and (2) the negotiability of specific proposals. Disputes over the former usually are processed through the Authority's unfair labor practice procedure and frequently involve make-whole and status quo ante remedies. Disputes over the latter usually are processed through the Authority's no-fault negotiability procedure in which the Authority determines whether proposals (or provisions disapproved by the agency head) are nonnegotiable because inconsistent with laws and regulations. In changes to 5 CFR Part 2424, effective April 1, 1999, the Authority distinguished between "bargaining disputes" and "negotiability disputes."
-
Fair Representation, Duty of
-
The union's duty to represent the interests of all unit employees without regard to union membership. However, in NTEU v. FLRA, 800 F.2d 1165 (D.C. Cir. 1986), the court held that the union's duty of fair representation is limited to matters as to which the union is the exclusive representative. (In that case, the union, which provided the services of an attorney to members in Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) proceedings, told an employee facing removal that the union wouldn't provide him with attorney services because he wasn't a member of the union.) The court dismissed the ULP because the right to appeal to MSPB does not arise out of the collective bargaining agreement and the employee was free to designate non-union representatives. Also see 28 FLRA No. 118, where FLRA said the following: "Where the union is acting as the exclusive representative of its unit members, we will continue to require that its activities be undertaken without discrimination and without regard to union membership under section 7114(a)(1). We will not, however, extend those statutory obligations to situations where the union is not acting as the exclusive representative."