Find out more about Federal compensation throughout your career and around the world.
Staffing to align with your agency's mission
Review the new 2014 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Congress approved a cost of living increase for Federal retirees.
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
This replies to your March 11, 1997 letter requesting that we reconsider our March 7, 1997 settlement denying your claim for back pay. For the reasons stated below, the settlement is affirmed.
In essence, you assert that in September, 1993, while serving under an appointment to a GS-12 position, you were assigned to the duties of a GS-13 position. As a result of a grievance, your employing agency appointed you to the GS-13 position effective January 7, 1996. Assuming these facts to be true, they do not entitle you to back pay. As noted in our earlier settlement letter, Federal employees are entitled only to the salary of the positions to which they are appointed, regardless of the duties they perform. Of course, there are exceptions to this rule, which are explained in the March 7 settlement letter. Unfortunately, it does not appear that these exceptions are applicable to your situation.
Therefore, the March 7 settlement letter correctly concluded that you are not entitled to back pay.
You also asked, if our decision was not favorable, to provide you with information on the next step of the process and any statutes of limitations that may apply. In general, your next step is to file suit in an appropriate United States court. For advice regarding the procedures and statutes of limitations applicable to such a suit, however, we suggest you might wish to contact your own legal counsel, who would be in the most appropriate position to offer advice on such litigation.
Very truly yours,