<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>Training and Development Policy Wiki Atom Feed (Page: Training Evaluation)</title>
  <updated>2012-11-13T12:12:40.060-05:00</updated>
  <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training</id>
  <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training" />
  <author>
    <name>Training and Development Policy Wiki</name>
    <uri>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</uri>
    <email>donotreply@opm.gov</email>
  </author>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T12:12:40.060-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T12:12:40.060-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator">Reporting Training Data</h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Sample Agency Training Report FY2010.pdf" class="ApplyClass">this Sample Agency Training Report FY2010</a><br />
<br />
</strong>OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T12:09:53.923-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T12:09:53.923-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Reporting Training Data</span></h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Sample Agency Training Report FY2010.pdf" class="ApplyClass">this Sample Agency Training Report FY2010</a><br />
<br />
</strong>OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T12:09:29.460-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T12:09:29.460-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Reporting Training Data</span></h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Sample Agency Training Report FY2010.pdf" class="ApplyClass">this Sample Agency Training Report FY2010</a><br />
<br />
</strong>OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T12:07:57.487-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T12:07:57.487-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Reporting Training Data</span></h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See <br />
<br />
</strong>OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T11:58:51.443-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T11:58:51.443-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Reporting Training Data</span></h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See Sample Agency Training Data Report</strong> <strong>HERE<br />
</strong><br />
OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T11:55:03.797-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T11:55:03.797-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). </p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Training Reporting</span></h2>
<p>The law authorizes OPM to require Federal agencies to report training data.  An important part of the evaluation process involves consideration of training costs, and other elements not directly addressed in the typical evaluaiton.  Agencies should track and report accurate training data on all completed training events to OPM as prescribed by the Final Rule on Training Reporting Requirements, published on May 17, 2006, in the Federal RegisterThe Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411). <strong>See Sample Agency Training Data Report</strong> <strong>HERE<br />
</strong><br />
OPM provides training data reports as an objective summary of data gathered about various aspects or each agency training event.  View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide and ways agencies can use evaluation and training data to inform decisions related to training investments. </p>
<p ><iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-11-13T11:45:22.230-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-11-13T11:45:22.230-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
</p>
<h2 class="separator"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Training Reporting</span></h2>
<p>The Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 (P.L. 108-411) and 5 CFR 410.202 require agencies to evaluate their training programs on a regular basis and ensure alignment with strategic goals. Training evaluation is an objective summary of data gathered about the effectiveness of the training. The primary purpose of evaluation data is to inform decisions.</p>
<p>Training evaluation data helps the organization determine whether the training is accomplishing its goals. They also help agencies decide how to adjust their training approaches for greater effectiveness. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. </p>
<p ><br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:26:25.520-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:26:25.520-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:26:17.940-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:26:17.940-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why should we evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:25:25.737-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:25:25.737-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:25:18.973-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:25:18.973-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:24:39.200-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:24:39.200-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. View this quick video for more information on the training evaluation field guide. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it related to Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Since programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings), training evaluation data can be used in the overall program evaluation.  <br />
<br />
Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:16:03.553-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:16:03.553-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  For more detailed information on logic models, you can watch this video or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. <iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:14:35.400-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:14:35.400-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  You can also see a video on logic modeling or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/aLC1PYDjgFo" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:11:57.410-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:11:57.410-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  You can also see a video on logic modeling or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:11:41.530-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:11:41.530-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  You can also see a video on logic modeling or take EPA's <a href="http://www.epa.gov/evaluate/lm-training/index.htm" class="ApplyClass">FREE</a> logic modeling course. Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:08:45.880-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:08:45.880-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  You can also see a video on logic modeling or take EPA's free logic modeling course. Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T11:08:37.580-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T11:08:37.580-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  You can also see a video on logic modeling or take EPA's free logic modeling course. Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-29T10:56:24.310-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-29T10:56:24.310-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-08-10T11:05:15.673-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-08-10T11:05:15.673-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>). <br />
<iframe height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/YkHvbqLgtHs" frameborder="0" width="420"></iframe></p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:14:20.953-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:14:20.953-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2 class="separator">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2 class="separator">Other Evaluation Resources</h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:11:59.037-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:11:59.037-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2>OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2>Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2>Other Evaluation Resources </h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:11:45.607-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:11:45.607-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2>OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2>Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2>Other Evaluation Resources </h2>
<p>(Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page)</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</p>
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product) </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation </li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome) </li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model </li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach </li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model </li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models </li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model </li>
    <li>Portraiture Model  </li>
</ul>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:09:36.600-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:09:36.600-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2>OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2>Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2>Other Evaluation Resources </h2>
<p>Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<ul>
    <li>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)</li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model</li>
    <li>Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model </li>
    <li>Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation</li>
    <li>CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)</li>
    <li>PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) </li>
    <li>Alkins' UCLA Model</li>
    <li>Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach</li>
    <li>Provus's Discrepancy Model</li>
    <li>Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models</li>
    <li>Illuminative Evaluation Model</li>
    <li>Portraiture Model </li>
</ul>
</span>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:08:55.993-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:08:55.993-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2>OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<h2>Training Evaluators</h2>
<p>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.</p>
<p>In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association</strong></a> <strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries.</p>
<h2>Other Evaluation Resources </h2>
<p>Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</p>
<p>Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:06:03.710-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:06:03.710-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /></p>
<h2>OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide</h2>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.</p>
<h3>Field Guide Development Process </h3>
<p>Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group.</p>
<h3>Key Audience and Usage</h3>
<p>This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies.</p>
<p>Specific users for this field guide are:</p>
<ul>
    <li>Training managers and supervisors </li>
    <li>Training liaisons/coordinators </li>
    <li>Agency evaluators </li>
    <li>Instructional designers </li>
    <li>Training facilitators </li>
    <li>Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </li>
</ul>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
</strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:01:54.997-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:01:54.997-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).</p>
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.
<div></div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
</strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T16:01:00.563-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T16:01:00.563-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training </li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability </li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application </li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance </li>
</ul>
<p>All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.</p>
<h3>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model</h3>
<p>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: </p>
<img alt="ROI(%) = (Net Program Benefits/Program Costs) x 100" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" />
<h3>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:</h3>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). </p>
<p>A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).</p>
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers.
<div></div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
</strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Larry Gillick. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T15:56:07.597-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T15:56:07.597-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Larry Gillick</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.  </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs. </li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy </li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives. </li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course. </li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? </li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
</p>
<h3>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels</h3>
<p>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: </p>
<ul>
    <li>Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training</li>
    <li>Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability</li>
    <li>Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and </li>
    <li>implementation/application</li>
    <li>Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula:
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
</strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by . <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-04-18T15:47:41.017-04:00</published>
    <updated>2012-04-18T15:47:41.017-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<h2 class="separator">What is Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination.  </p>
<p>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em>(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency. </em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em>cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov)</em></a>)</p>
<h2 class="separator">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</h2>
<p>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.</p>
<p>A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL</a> for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><em>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</em></a> for more information on conducting a Program Evaluation.</p>
<h2 class="separator">When we Evaluate... </h2>
<ul>
    <li>We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based </li>
    <li>We inquire, up front, about the expected results </li>
    <li>We create then study the goals and objectives  </li>
    <li>We collect information about inputs and outcomes. </li>
    <li>We compare it to some pre-set standards. </li>
    <li>We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">Why Evaluate? </h2>
<p>Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</p>
<h3>Planning</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To assess needs.</li>
    <li>To set priorities. </li>
    <li>To direct allocation of resources. </li>
    <li>To guide policy</li>
</ul>
<h3>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality</h3>
<ul>
    <li>To determine achievement of objectives.</li>
    <li>To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.</li>
    <li>To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.</li>
    <li>To assess causes of success or failure.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Direct decision-making </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To improve effectiveness. </li>
    <li>To identify and facilitate needed change. </li>
    <li>To continue expand or terminate a program/course.</li>
</ul>
<h3>Maintain accountability </h3>
<ul>
    <li>To stakeholders. </li>
    <li>To funding sources. </li>
    <li>To the general public.</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">When to Evaluate</h2>
<p>There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </p>
<ul>
    <li>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </li>
    <li>Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation?</li>
    <li>Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course?</li>
    <li>Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation?</li>
</ul>
<h2 class="separator">How To Evaluate</h2>
<p>Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: </p>
<p> </p>
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
</strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;"><br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small;">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cassandra Cunfer. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2012-01-19T13:29:31.897-05:00</published>
    <updated>2012-01-19T13:29:31.897-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cassandra Cunfer</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none; "></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br /><br />To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency </span></em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">)<br /></span></em><span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><span style="font-size: 18px; "><br /><em>What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br /><br />different from Training Evaluation?</em></span><em>  <br /></em></strong></span><br />Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br /><br />A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <strong></strong></span><a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</strong></span><strong> </strong></a><strong></strong>f<span style="font-size: small; ">or more information on conducting a Program Evaluation </span> <span style="font-size: 13px; "><br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "></span></p><p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br /></span></p><p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong>Planning <br /></strong>To assess needs. <br />To set priorities. <br />To direct allocation of resources. <br />To guide policy</span></p><p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br /></strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />To assess causes of success or failure.</p><p><strong>Direct decision-making <br /></strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p><p><strong>Maintain accountability <br /></strong>To stakeholders. <br />To funding sources. <br />To the general public. <br /><strong> <br /></strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p></span><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br /></span><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br />Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br /></strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br /><br /></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br /><br />Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br /><br />All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br /><br /></strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br /><br /></span></p><div style="text-align: left; "><strong><span style="color: #000099; "> </span><img alt="" width="300" height="73" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br /></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><br /></span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br /></span></strong><br />Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br /><br />A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br /><br /><strong><img alt="" width="620" height="367" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px; " id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br /><br /><br /></strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br /></span></em><br /></strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />•Agency evaluators <br />•Instructional designers <br />•Training facilitators <br />•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">Training Evaluators<br /></span></em><br /></strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br /><br />In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br /><br /><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2; "><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br /></strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; "><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br /></strong></span></em></span></span><span style="font-size: small; "><br /></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: small; ">Here are sample spreadsheets designed to track <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Training Class Evaluation Summary Form.xls">New Employee Orientation</a> classes and <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Trainer Cust Sat Tracking Form.xls">Trainer Customer Satisfaction</a>. </span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: small; "><br /></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: small; ">Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from...</span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />Alkins' UCLA Model<br />Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />Portraiture Model </p></span><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-29T22:01:33.643-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-29T22:01:33.643-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none; "></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br /><br />To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency </span></em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">)<br /></span></em><span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><span style="font-size: 18px; "><br /><em>What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br /><br />different from Training Evaluation?</em></span><em>  <br /></em></strong></span><br />Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br /><br />A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the <strong></strong></span><a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Program Evaluation Beginners Guide.pdf" class="ApplyClass" target="_blank"><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong>Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</strong></span><strong> </strong></a><strong></strong>f<span style="font-size: small; ">or more information on conducting a Program Evaluation </span> <span style="font-size: 13px; "><br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "></span></p><p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br /></span></p><p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong>Planning <br /></strong>To assess needs. <br />To set priorities. <br />To direct allocation of resources. <br />To guide policy</span></p><p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br /></strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />To assess causes of success or failure.</p><p><strong>Direct decision-making <br /></strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p><p><strong>Maintain accountability <br /></strong>To stakeholders. <br />To funding sources. <br />To the general public. <br /><strong> <br /></strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p></span><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br /></span><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br />Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br /></strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br /><br /></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br /><br />Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br /><br />All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br /><br /></strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br /><br /></span></p><div style="text-align: left; "><strong><span style="color: #000099; "> </span><img alt="" width="300" height="73" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br /></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><br /></span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br /></span></strong><br />Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br /><br />A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br /><br /><strong><img alt="" width="620" height="367" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px; " id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br /><br /><br /></strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br /></span></em><br /></strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />•Agency evaluators <br />•Instructional designers <br />•Training facilitators <br />•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">Training Evaluators<br /></span></em><br /></strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br /><br />In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br /><br /><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2; "><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br /></strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; "><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br /><br /></strong></span></em></span></span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p><p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />Alkins' UCLA Model<br />Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />Portraiture Model </p></span><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-29T21:59:03.230-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-29T21:59:03.230-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none; "></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br /><br />To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency </span></em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 10px; ">)<br /></span></em><span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><span style="font-size: 18px; "><br /><em>What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br /><br />different from Training Evaluation?</em></span><em>  <br /></em></strong></span><br />Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br /><br />A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.  Please see the Program Evaluation Beginner's Guide</span> f<span style="font-size: small; ">or more information on conducting a Program Evaluation </span> <span style="font-size: 13px; "><br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "></span></p><p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br /></span></p><p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong>Planning <br /></strong>To assess needs. <br />To set priorities. <br />To direct allocation of resources. <br />To guide policy</span></p><p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br /></strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />To assess causes of success or failure.</p><p><strong>Direct decision-making <br /></strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p><p><strong>Maintain accountability <br /></strong>To stakeholders. <br />To funding sources. <br />To the general public. <br /><strong> <br /></strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p></span><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br /></span><span style="font-size: 13px; "><br />Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br /><br /></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br /></strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br /><br /></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br /><br />Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br /><br />All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br /><br /><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br /><br /></strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br /><br /></span></p><div style="text-align: left; "><strong><span style="color: #000099; "> </span><img alt="" width="300" height="73" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br /></strong><span style="text-decoration: underline; font-size: 18px; "><br /></span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br /></span></strong><br />Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br /><br />A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br /><br /><strong><img alt="" width="620" height="367" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px; " id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br /><br /><br /></strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br /></span></em><br /></strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p><p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 18px; "><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; ">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />•Agency evaluators <br />•Instructional designers <br />•Training facilitators <br />•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p><p style="margin-top: 0in; margin-right: 0in; margin-bottom: 0pt; margin-left: 0in; "><span style="font-size: 13px; "><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; ">Training Evaluators<br /></span></em><br /></strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br /><br />In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br /><br /><br /><span style="font-family: 'times new roman'; font-size: 24px; "><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2; "><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br /></strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; "><strong><span style="font-size: 16px; ">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br /><br /></strong></span></em></span></span></p><span style="font-size: 13px; "><p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p><p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />Alkins' UCLA Model<br />Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />Portraiture Model </p></span><p></p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p>]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:33:47.207-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:33:47.207-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em><span style="font-size: 10px;">(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency </span></em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em><span style="font-size: 10px;">cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 10px;">)<br />
</span></em><span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
<em>What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</em></span><em>  <br />
</em></strong></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:33:40.880-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:33:40.880-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <em><span style="font-size: 10px;">(Please contact us if you would like training on how you can use of the field guide in your agency </span></em><a href="mailto:cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov"><em><span style="font-size: 10px;">cheryl.ndunguru@opm.gov</span></em></a><em><span style="font-size: 10px;">)<br />
</span></em><span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;"><br />
<em>What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</em></span><em>  <br />
</em></strong></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency training. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate your agency training.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:29:00.540-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:29:00.540-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</span>  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:28:43.820-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:28:43.820-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training  effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</span>  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:27:57.037-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:27:57.037-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="http://www.opm.gov/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field%20Guide%20to%20Training%20Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</span>  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of course/program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program/course.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program/course.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program/course. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program/course important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out a program evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program/course? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program or course warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training courses.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training course using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:23:40.430-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:23:40.430-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or <br />
<br />
different from Training Evaluation?</span>  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program or initiative (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings).  Please reference this <a href="/wiki/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Logic Model Template (wiki).doc">LOGIC MODEL </a>for further explanation of the differences and similarities.  A logic model provides a representation of the "theory of change" (if...then) behind a program or iniative.  Logic models can be completed for programs and initiatives and for individual courses, events or activities.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training course or program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives  <br />
We collect information about inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Use of evaluation data meets these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by . <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T14:13:27.077-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T14:13:27.077-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course, activity or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the training (e.g. instructional design, delivery, results) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">What is Program Evaluation and how is it similar or different from Training Evaluation?</span>  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program (training programs and other types of programs), from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  While the principles of training evaluation can apply in an overall program, training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (e.g training courses and events).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, meetings, , etc.).  Please see this LOGIC MODEL  <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T12:17:14.410-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T12:17:14.410-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
</strong></em></span><br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
<br />
A program evaluation is used to assess and asks questions about every aspect of a program, from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (program results).  Training evaluation is used to assess the training/development activities within the program (training courses).  Programs may have activities in addition to training (e.g. services, use of technology, etc.)  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"> 
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-12-02T12:10:59.547-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-12-02T12:10:59.547-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
</strong></em></span>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  The Government Accountability Office (GAO) works for Congress and regularly conducts Program Evaluations.  They are responsible for investigating how the Federal Government spends tax dollars.<br />
<br />
A program evaluation addresses and asks questions about every aspect of a program,  from the inputs (what resources were used to create the program) and to the outcomes (results).  Training evaluation pertains to the training/development activities within the program (training courses).   <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"> 
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by . <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T11:53:19.690-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T11:53:19.690-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
</strong></em></span>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.  For  Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T10:32:37.860-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T10:32:37.860-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. For example, in a Senior Executive Service Candidate Development Program (SESCDP) there are various training components (e.g. 80 hour training, developmental assignment) one long term outcome may be  <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
</strong></em></span>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs.  For  Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T09:57:21.280-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T09:57:21.280-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
Example:  An example of a training course is the<br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
</strong></em></span>Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs. Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  </span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T09:52:48.397-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T09:52:48.397-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  A program evaluation examines achievement of program objectives in the context of other aspects of program performance or in the context in which it occurs. Program evaluations are often conducted by experts external to the program,either inside or outside the agency.  </span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p> <strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T09:45:37.350-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T09:45:37.350-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  They are often conducted by experts external to the program, either inside or outside the agency, as well as by program managers.  A <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-family: century-book; font-size: 10px;"><span style="font-family: century-book; font-size: 10px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p  style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p ><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by . <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-11-30T09:43:27.300-05:00</published>
    <updated>2011-11-30T09:43:27.300-05:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of a training course or event.  Results of the evaluation are used to guide decision-making around various components of the course (e.g. outcomes, instructional design, delivery) and it's overall continuation, modification, or elimination. <br />
<br />
What is Program Evaluation?  <br />
Program evaluation is a systematic study conducted to assess how well a program is working.  They are often conducted by experts external to the program, either inside or outside the agency, as well as by program managers.  A <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-family: century-book; font-size: 10px;"><span style="font-family: century-book; font-size: 10px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p  style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p ><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-09-14T08:30:30.267-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-09-14T08:30:30.267-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-23T14:05:39.260-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-23T14:05:39.260-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-23T14:05:32.977-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-23T14:05:32.977-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-16T11:28:27.653-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-16T11:28:27.653-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-16T11:27:52.473-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-16T11:27:52.473-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
<a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/OPM TED.ppt">ATF Presentation</a> </p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:45:29.463-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:45:29.463-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:44:39.570-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:44:39.570-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:43:50.353-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:43:50.353-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:43:10.353-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:43:10.353-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:42:00.313-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:42:00.313-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added the fifth level the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong><br />
Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models (a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment). <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </div>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:39:19.403-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:39:19.403-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. <br />
<br />
<br />
</span>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added a fifth level--the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<strong>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</strong></span></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:38:20.273-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:38:20.273-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy
<p><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</p>
<p><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </p>
<p><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips added a fifth level--the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<strong>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</strong></span></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">OPM's Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data and information were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:35:08.203-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:35:08.203-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.
<p> </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy</span>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong></span>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong></span>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong></span>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<strong>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</strong></span></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Julie Brill. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-15T13:34:51.523-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-15T13:34:51.523-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Julie Brill</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based <br />
We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program <br />
We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use.
<p> </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>To assess needs. <br />
To set priorities. <br />
To direct allocation of resources. <br />
To guide policy</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong></span>To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong></span>To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong></span>To stakeholders. <br />
To funding sources. <br />
To the general public. <br />
<strong> <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>When to Evaluate</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
Learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
Behavior - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
Results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
</strong></span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><strong><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
</strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<strong>Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</strong></span></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<strong><img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
</strong><strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf"><strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong></a> in 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The Training Evaluation Field Guide (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
In addition, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/"><strong>American Evaluation Association </strong></a><strong>(AEA)</strong> is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources <br />
</strong></span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><strong><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</strong></span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:42:09.317-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:42:09.317-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. </p>
<p>--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </p>
<p>--We compare it to some pre-set standards. </p>
<p>--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are a few of the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of trainee</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Robert Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:35:51.220-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:35:51.220-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. </p>
<p>--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </p>
<p>--We compare it to some pre-set standards. </p>
<p>--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:34:59.020-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:34:59.020-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. </p>
<p>--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </p>
<p>--We compare it to some pre-set standards. </p>
<p>--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:34:45.890-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:34:45.890-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. </p>
<p>--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </p>
<p>--We compare it to some pre-set standards. </p>
<p>--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:33:56.523-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:33:56.523-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </p>
<p> </p>
<p>--We compare it to some pre-set standards. </p>
<p>--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:31:05.550-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:31:05.550-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:30:22.067-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:30:22.067-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:30:16.580-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:30:16.580-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:08:01.323-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:08:01.323-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em><span style="background-color: #f2f2f2;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> <br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00;"><span style="font-size: 16px;">Please feel free to add your evaluation methods and tools to this page</span><br />
<br />
</span></em></span></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
 </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T16:05:52.663-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T16:05:52.663-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong><em><span style="background-color: #bfbfbf; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluators<br />
</span></em><br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Phillips (and maybe others) offer "certifications" in training evaluation, however, a "certified" evaluator is not necessary to evaluate the effectiveness of agency programs. The <strong>Training Evaluation Field Guide</strong> (linked above) and books on the various methods should provide enough information to successfully evaluate a program.<br />
<br />
Nevertheless, the <a href="http://www.eval.org/">American Evaluation Association </a>(AEA) is an international professional association of evaluators devoted to the application and exploration of program evaluation, personnel evaluation, technology, and many other forms of evaluation. Evaluation involves assessing the strengths and weaknesses of programs, policies, personnel, products, and organizations to improve their effectiveness. AEA has approximately 5500 members representing all 50 states in the US as well as over 60 foreign countries. <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:56:45.100-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:56:45.100-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><em>•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </em></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Training Evaluators<br />
<br />
</strong>Both Kirkpatrick and Jack Phillips offer training evaluation "certifications".  <br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>Should you desire to look at more evaluation models, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:39:06.133-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:39:06.133-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brtinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong><br />
<br />
<br />
Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:37:49.880-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:37:49.880-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong><br />
<br />
Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these levels are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<div style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000099;"> </span><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /><br />
<strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></div>
<p>Brtinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the  <a href="/WIKI/uploads/docs/Wiki/OPM/training/Field Guide to Training Evaluation_6-8-2011-FINAL.pdf">Training Evaluation Field Guide</a> in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:30:41.880-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:30:41.880-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;">Brinkerhoff's Success Case Method:<br />
</span></strong></p>
<p>Brtinkerhoff's six stage model is a comprehensive evaluation model that incorporates the results oriented aspects of the business and industry models and also the formative, improvement-orientated aspects of educational models --- a systems perspective with an emphasis on return on investment. <br />
<br />
A basic assumption of the six stage model is that the primary reason for evaluation should be to improve the program (systems perspective).<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<strong><em><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;">Training Evaluation Field Guide<br />
</span></em></strong><br />
To assist agencies in evaluating their training programs, OPM published the Training Evaluation Field Guide in January 2011. The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
</span><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Field Guide Development Process </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #b2a2c7; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;"><em><strong>Key Audience and Usage </strong></em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:24:44.020-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:24:44.020-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p>Brinkerhoff's Success Factors:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:24:38.080-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:24:38.080-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p>Brinkerhoff's Success Factors:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 387px; padding-right: 8px; height: 274px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:23:46.217-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:23:46.217-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p>Brinkerhoff's Success Factors:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 607px; padding-right: 8px; height: 376px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:23:01.687-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:23:01.687-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p>Brinkerhoff's Success Factors:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<img width="620" height="367" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 607px; padding-right: 8px; height: 376px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://www.teacherscouncil.govt.nz/prt/research/successcase.gif" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T15:16:51.293-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T15:16:51.293-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>What is Training Evaluation?</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>When we Evaluate... </em></strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate? </em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Planning <br />
</span></strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</span></strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Direct decision-making <br />
</span></strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 16px;">Maintain accountability <br />
</span></strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
</span><strong><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><em>When to Evaluate</em></span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="background-color: #ffff00; font-family: times new roman; font-size: 24px;"><strong><em>How To Evaluate<br />
</em></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
<span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong><span style="font-size: 18px;">Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
</span></strong></span>The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure: <strong>Reaction of student</strong> - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
<strong>Learning</strong> - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
<strong>Behavior</strong> - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
<strong>Results</strong> - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations.<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 18px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
</strong><br />
</span>Building upon the Kirkpatrack model, Jack Phillips has since added a fifth level. That being the Return On Investment (ROI) produced by a training program using the financial formula: <br />
<br />
<center>
<p><img width="300" height="73" alt="" src="http://www.internetraining.com/Productivity/0.gif" /></p>
</center>
<p>Brinkerhoff's Success Factors:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p> </p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:48:07.177-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:48:07.177-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050;"><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods and models agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
Kirkpatrick 4 Levels:<br />
<br />
The four levels of Kirkpatrick's evaluation model essentially measure:
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>reaction of student - what they thought and felt about the training<br />
learning - the resulting increase in knowledge or capability<br />
behaviour - extent of behaviour and capability improvement and implementation/application<br />
results - the effects on the business or environment resulting from the trainee's performance<br />
All these measures are recommended for full and meaningful evaluation of learning in organizations, although their application broadly increases in complexity, and usually cost, through the levels from level 1-4.</p>
<p>Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:42:48.050-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:42:48.050-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
<br />
<span style="background-color: #00b050;"><strong>How To Evaluate<br />
</strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Once you've determined whether or not your program warrants evaluation, there are various methods agencies can use to evaluate their training programs.  Here are the most popular:<br />
<br />
Kirkpatrick 4 Levels: <br />
Jack Phillips' Five Level ROI Model<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
The Training Evaluation Field Guide is designed to assist agency training representatives in evaluating training program effectiveness and in demonstrating training value to stakeholders and decision makers. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Field Guide Development Process </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Data were gathered from fifteen federal agency representatives who volunteered their time to attend a one-day working meeting, participate in individual interviews and submit samples of their tools and case studies. This Field Guide reflects the input from the working group. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Key Audience and Usage </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">This Guide is designed for all federal employees who have a role in training evaluation and effectiveness within their agencies. <br />
Specific users for this field guide are: </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">•Training managers and supervisors <br />
•Training liaisons/coordinators <br />
•Agency evaluators <br />
•Instructional designers <br />
•Training facilitators <br />
•Any others who have a significant role in training effectiveness </span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some evaluation options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px; text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Other Evaluation Resources</strong> </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>For reference, should you be keen to look at more ideas, there are many to choose from... </p>
<p>Daniel Stufflebeam's CIPP Model (Context, Input, Process, Product)<br />
Robert Stake's Responsive Evaluation Model<br />
Robert Stake's Congruence-Contingency Model <br />
Kaufman's Five Levels of Evaluation<br />
CIRO (Context, Input, Reaction, Outcome)<br />
PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) <br />
Alkins' UCLA Model<br />
Michael Scriven's Goal-Free Evaluation Approach<br />
Provus's Discrepancy Model<br />
Eisner's Connoisseurship Evaluation Models<br />
Illuminative Evaluation Model<br />
Portraiture Model <br />
and also the American Evaluation Association</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:34:41.573-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:34:41.573-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">--<span style="font-size: 13px;">Is the level of evidence significant enough to warrant an evaluation<br />
</span>    <br />
<img width="277" height="182" alt="" style="width: 277px; height: 182px;" id="rg_hi" class="rg_hi" src="" data-height="182" data-width="277" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:29:31.720-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:29:31.720-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">--<span style="font-size: 13px;">Is the level of evidence significant enough to warrant an evaluation<br />
</span>    <br />
<img width="500" height="499" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 315px; padding-right: 8px; height: 409px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://consultgerirn.org/uploads/Image/Pyramid_Chart2.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:29:26.447-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:29:26.447-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
</span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">--<span style="font-size: 13px;">Is the level of evidence significant enough to warrant an evaluation<br />
</span>    <br />
<img width="500" height="499" alt="" style="padding-bottom: 8px; width: 315px; padding-right: 8px; height: 409px; padding-top: 8px;" id="il_fi" src="http://consultgerirn.org/uploads/Image/Pyramid_Chart2.jpg" /><br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:26:58.993-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:26:58.993-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p> <span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? <br />
</span><span style="font-size: 13px;"><br />
--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
</span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">--<span style="font-size: 13px;">Is the level of evidence significant enough to warrant an evaluation<br />
</span>    **<br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T14:23:59.780-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T14:23:59.780-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>What is Training Evaluation?</strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Training evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of training programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>When we Evaluate... </strong></span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed training program is based</p>
<p>--We inquire, up front, about the expected results of the training program </p>
<p>--We create then study the goals and objectives of the program. <br />
<br />
--We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. <br />
<br />
--We compare it to some pre-set standards. <br />
<br />
--We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="background-color: #92d050; font-size: 13px;"><strong>Why Evaluate? </strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">Agencies are required to evaluate their training programs annually to determine how well such plans and programs contribute to mission accomplishment and meet organizational performance goals (5 CFR 410.202). In addition, demands to demonstrate training program efficiency, program effectiveness and public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways:</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Planning <br />
</strong>--To assess needs. <br />
--To set priorities. <br />
--To direct allocation of resources. <br />
--To guide policy</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Analysis of program effectiveness or quality <br />
</strong>--To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
--To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
--To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
--To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Direct decision-making <br />
</strong>--To improve program management and effectiveness. <br />
--To identify and facilitate needed change. <br />
--To continue expand or terminate a program. </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;"><strong>Maintain accountability <br />
</strong>--To stakeholders. <br />
--To funding sources. <br />
--To the general public. <br />
 <br />
<strong><span style="background-color: #92d050;">When to Evaluate</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "Yes", this may be the time to evaluate. </span></p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="font-size: 13px;">
<p>--Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? </p>
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? </span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: 13px;">--Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? <br />
</span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><br />
<br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Solve Problems</strong></span> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
<span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"> </span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by . <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-13T12:42:14.103-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-13T12:42:14.103-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name />
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span></b></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Solve Problems</span></strong> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-08T11:44:07.110-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-08T11:44:07.110-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span></b></p>
<h3 class="separator"><em><span style="font-family: times new roman;">What is Evaluation?</span></em></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"></span></p>
<i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of Extension programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 24px;"><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><br />
When we evaluate...</strong></span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</i></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed program is based. <br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We study the goals and objectives of the program.
    <li></li>
    </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes.
    <li></li>
    </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We compare it to some pre-set standards.
    <li></li>
    </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We make a value judgment about the program.
    <li></li>
    </span></li>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </span></li>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
</i>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 32px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate?</em></strong></span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">
<p><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Demands on Extension for program efficiency, program effectiveness and for public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways.<br />
<br />
</span></i><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Planning</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <li></li>
</ul>
</span></p>
</p>
<ul>
    <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess needs.</span> <br />
    <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To set priorities.</span> <br />
    <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">T</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">o direct allocation of resources.</span> <br />
    <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To guide policy.</span>
    <ul></ul>
        </span></li>
    </ul>
    <p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality </span></p>
    <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
    </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
    </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine if the needs of beneficiaries are being met. </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
    </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess causes of success or failure.<br />
    <br />
    </span><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Direct decision-making</span> <br />
    </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">
    <ul>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To improve program management and effectiveness.</span> </li>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify and facilitate needed change.</span> </li>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To continue expand or terminate a program.</span></li>
    </ul>
    <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
    </span></p>
    <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Maintain accountability </span></p>
    <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">
    <ul>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To stakeholders.
        <li></li>
        </span></li>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To funding sources.
        <li></li>
        </span></li>
        <li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To the general public.
        <ul></ul>
            <p>&nbsp;</p>
            </span></li>
        </ul>
        <p>&nbsp;</p>
        </span>
        <p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program impact assessment </span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><br />
        To discover a program’s impact on individuals and/or communities. <br />
        <br />
        </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Advocate </span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> </span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To gain support from policy makers and advisory councils.<br />
        </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To direct attention to needs of particular stakeholder groups.</span></span><span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;"> 
        <p> </p>
        </span></p>
        <p>&nbsp;</p>
        <p> </p>
        <span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;">
        <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>When to Evaluate</em></strong></span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
        </span>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "No", this may not be the time for an evaluation.</span>
        <p> </p>
        <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? <br />
        <br />
        </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? </span></p>
        </i>
        <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? <br />
        <br />
        Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
        <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Are sufficient funds available to carry out the evaluation? </span></p>
        <p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there enough time to complete the evaluation? </span></p>
        </span></p>
        <p>&nbsp;</p>
        <p> </p>
        <p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
        <p> </p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Solve Problems</span></strong> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
        </span></strong></p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
        <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-03T13:25:36.687-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-03T13:25:36.687-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span></b></p>
<h3 class="separator"><em><span style="font-family: times new roman;">What is Evaluation?</span></em></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"></span></p>
<i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of Extension programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 24px;"><i> <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong>When we evaluate...</strong></span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</i></span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed program is based. <br />
</span>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</i>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We study the goals and objectives of the program. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We compare it to some pre-set standards. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We make a value judgment about the program. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </span>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 32px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate?</em></strong></span>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Demands on Extension for program efficiency, program effectiveness and for public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways.<br />
<br />
</span></i><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Planning</span>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess needs.</span> </li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To set priorities.</span> </li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">T</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">o direct allocation of resources.</span> </li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To guide policy.</span>
<p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine if the needs of beneficiaries are being met. </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess causes of success or failure.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Direct decision-making</span>
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To improve program management and effectiveness.</span> </li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify and facilitate needed change.</span> </li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To continue expand or terminate a program.</span>
<p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Maintain accountability </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To stakeholders.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To funding sources.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To the general public.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program impact assessment </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><br />
To discover a program’s impact on individuals and/or communities. <br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Advocate </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To gain support from policy makers and advisory councils.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To direct attention to needs of particular stakeholder groups.</span><span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;"> 
<p> </p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>When to Evaluate</em></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
</span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "No", this may not be the time for an evaluation.</span>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? </span></p>
</i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? <br />
<br />
Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Are sufficient funds available to carry out the evaluation? </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there enough time to complete the evaluation? </span></p>
</span></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Solve Problems</span></strong> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
</li>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-03T13:25:26.770-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-03T13:25:26.770-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span></b></p>
<h3 class="separator"><em><span style="font-family: times new roman;">What is Evaluation?</span></em></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"></span></p>
<i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of Extension programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 24px;"><i> <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong>When we evaluate...</strong></span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</i></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed program is based. <br />
</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
</i>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We study the goals and objectives of the program. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We compare it to some pre-set standards. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We make a value judgment about the program. </span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </span></li>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 32px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate?</em></strong></span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Demands on Extension for program efficiency, program effectiveness and for public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways.<br />
<br />
</span></i><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Planning</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess needs.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To set priorities.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">T</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">o direct allocation of resources.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To guide policy.</span></li>
<p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine achievement of project objectives.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine if the needs of beneficiaries are being met. </span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess causes of success or failure.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-size: 18px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Direct decision-making</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To improve program management and effectiveness.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify and facilitate needed change.</span></li>
<li><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To continue expand or terminate a program.</span></li>
<p><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Maintain accountability </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> <span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To stakeholders.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To funding sources.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To the general public.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program impact assessment </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><br />
To discover a program’s impact on individuals and/or communities. <br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Advocate </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To gain support from policy makers and advisory councils.<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To direct attention to needs of particular stakeholder groups.</span><span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;"> 
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>When to Evaluate</em></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "No", this may not be the time for an evaluation.</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? <br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? </span></p>
</i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? <br />
<br />
Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Are sufficient funds available to carry out the evaluation? </span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there enough time to complete the evaluation? </span></p>
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Solve Problems</span></strong> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></strong></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Stay Current</span></b> What can I learn that will help me refresh my knowledge base and add value?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>Create Opportunities</strong></span> (What can be done to create low cost learning experiences?)</p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 13px;"></span></p>
]]></content>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <id>http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx</id>
    <title>Training Evaluation</title>
    <summary type="html"><![CDATA[Page edited by Cheryl Ndunguru. <a href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx">more</a>]]></summary>
    <published>2011-06-03T13:07:48.210-04:00</published>
    <updated>2011-06-03T13:07:48.210-04:00</updated>
    <link rel="alternate" href="http://www.opm.gov/wiki/training/Training-Evaluation.ashx" />
    <author>
      <name>Cheryl Ndunguru</name>
    </author>
    <content type="html"><![CDATA[<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><b><span style="text-decoration: none;"></span></b></p>
<h3 class="separator"><em><span style="font-family: times new roman;">What is Evaluation?</span></em></h3>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"></span></p>
<i>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program evaluation is a continual and systematic process of assessing the value or potential value of Extension programs to guide decision-making for the program’s future.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 24px;"><i>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong>When we evaluate...</strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</i></span></p>
</i>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <ul><span style="font-size: 18px;">
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman;">We examine the assumptions upon which an existing or proposed program is based. </span></div>
        </li>
        </span>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We study the goals and objectives of the program. </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We collect information about a program’s inputs and outcomes. </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We compare it to some pre-set standards. </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We make a value judgment about the program. </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman; font-size: 18px;">We report findings in a manner that facilitates their use. </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-size: 32px;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;"><strong><em>Why Evaluate?</em></strong></span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<i><span style="font-size: 18px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Demands on Extension for program efficiency, program effectiveness and for public accountability are increasing. Evaluation can help meet these demands in various ways.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</i>
<ul>
    <ul><span style="font-size: 18px;">
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Planning </span></div>
        </li>
        </span>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess needs.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To set priorities.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To direct allocation of resources.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To guide policy.</span></p>
</dir></dir></dir></dir>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Analysis of program effectiveness or quality </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine achievement of project objectives.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify strengths and weaknesses of a program.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: footlight mt light;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine if the needs of beneficiaries are being met.</span>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To determine the cost-effectiveness of a program.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To assess causes of success or failure.</span></p>
</dir></dir></dir></dir>
<ul>
    <ul><span style="font-size: 18px;">
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Direct decision-making</span> </div>
        </li>
        </span>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To improve program management and effectiveness.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To identify and facilitate needed change.<br />
<br />
</span><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To continue expand or terminate a program.</span></p>
</dir></dir></dir></dir>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Maintain accountability </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To stakeholders.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To funding sources.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">To the general public.</span></p>
</dir></dir></dir></dir>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif; font-size: 18px;">Program impact assessment </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<dir><dir><dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To discover a program’s impact on individuals and/or communities. </span></p>
</dir></dir></dir></dir></dir></dir><span style="font-size: 18px;">
<ul>
    <ul>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Advocate </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
<dir><dir><dir><dir>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To gain support from policy makers and advisory councils.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">To direct attention to needs of particular stakeholder groups.</span></p>
<span style="font-size: 18px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
</span><span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
</span></dir></dir></dir></dir><span style="font-family: footlight mt light; font-size: 24px;">
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">When to Evaluate</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</span>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: 18px;"><i>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">There are several basic questions to ask when deciding whether to carry out an evaluation. If the answers to these questions are "No", this may not be the time for an evaluation.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: left; margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">&nbsp;</p>
</i>
<p style="text-align: left;"> </p>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is the program important or significant enough to warrant evaluation? </span></div>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there a legal requirement to carry out an evaluation? </span></div>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Will the results of the evaluation influence decision-making about the program? Will the evaluation answer questions posed by your stakeholders or those interested in the evaluation? </span></div>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Are sufficient funds available to carry out the evaluation? </span></div>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
<p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
    <ul>
        <p style="text-align: left;">&nbsp;</p>
        <li>
        <div style="text-align: left;"><span style="font-family: times new roman, times, serif;">Is there enough time to complete the evaluation? </span></div>
        </li>
    </ul>
</ul>
</span></p>
<p  style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Solve Problems</span></strong> (What are some low cost training options available to me?) </p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></strong><span style="color: #000000;"><strong><span style="font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;">On-the-job training</span> </strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="color: #000000;">Hands on learning for the employee utilizing the required equipment and resources as they are learning the job. This method of training would be the most effective learning environment for an employee due to the fact that the employee is demonstrating transfer of learning simultaneously as they are gaining the knowledge and skill through instruction.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;">Train the trainer programs</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="color: #000000;">Due to expensive price tags on training events, organizations will send one or two employees to be trained on a particular topic. The employees will return back to the organization and be expected to train other employees that need the same particular skill or knowledge. The employees are labeled as the trainer with subject matter expertise for the particular topic in the organization, and will train other employees in the future.<br />
<br />
<strong><span style="font-weight: normal; text-decoration: underline;">Cross-training (e.g., details, developmental assignments, special projects)</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="color: #000000;">Training that covers several tasks within a department or office. Employees in a particular department will master their own tasks of responsibility and the tasks of their co-workers in the event that extra help may be needed and different areas require coverage. Cross-training can typically be accomplished internally with the more senior employees being the trainers. Cross-training is appropriate when turnover is high, and headcount cannot be filled immediately due to budget cuts.<br />
<br />
</span></p>
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><strong><span style="color: #000000; font-weight