Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
On June 26, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) is unconstitutional. As a result of the Supreme Court's decision, the United States Office of Personnel Management (OPM) will now be able to extend certain benefits to Federal employees and annuitants who have legally married a spouse of the same sex, regardless of the employee's or annuitant’s state of residency. OPM is currently in the process of updating and revising the website to reflect this change, and will be updating this information as soon as possible. Please check back in the coming weeks for updates.
It depends. FSAFEDS follows IRS rules on dependents. If you can claim your same-sex domestic partner/spouse as a tax dependent, then you may be reimbursed under your FSAFEDS account for his or her eligible expenses.
Yes. Lump-sum amounts payable on the death of a Federal employee or annuitant may be designated to go to any individual. If an employee or annuitant wishes to designate their same sex domestic partners to receive a lump sum, it is imperative that they do so affirmatively by making an election on an SF 2808.
Lump-sum benefits are paid in accordance with the statutory order of precedence under 5 U.S.C. § 8342(c) (CSRS) (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title5/html/USCODE-2010-title5-partIII-subpartG-chap83-subchapIII-sec8342.htm) or 5 U.S.C. § 8424(d) (FERS) (http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCODE-2010-title5/html/USCODE-2010-title5-partIII-subpartG-chap84-subchapII-sec8424.htm). Same-sex domestic partners are not among those listed in the statutory order of preference. Further, a same sex spouse cannot receive lump-sum benefits as a “widow” or “widower” under the statutory order of precedence (i.e., the second order of precedence under 5 U.S.C. §§ 8342(d) and 8424(d)) as a result of DOMA. Therefore, in order for same-sex domestic partners or spouses to receive lump-sum benefits, employees or annuitants must designate their same-sex domestic partners or spouses under the first order of precedence (through a designated beneficiary) using SF 2808, Designation of Beneficiary, Civil Service Retirement System (http://www.opm.gov/forms/pdf_fill/sf2808.pdf), and SF 3102, Designation of Beneficiary, Federal Employees Retirement System (http://www.opm.gov/Forms/pdf_fill/SF3102.pdf).
Yes. There is no limitation on the designation of individual beneficiaries under the FEGLI program. Thus, a Federal employee may designate his or her same-sex domestic partner/spouse or a child of the domestic partner/spouse as the primary or secondary beneficiary on SF 2823, Designation of Beneficiary, Federal Employees’ Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Program.
OPM has established websites containing helpful information about each program. Here are the links:
· Federal Leave Policy: http://www.opm.gov/oca/leave/
(Note that FSAFEDS is the Federal employee application of a law that applies to taxpayers, generally, and there is no separate statutory provision for Federal employees in particular.)
Generally, agencies may choose whether or not to require employees to provide documentation (such as a sworn affidavit) to establish the existence of a domestic partnership with respect to specific benefits. In determining whether to require documentation, however, agencies must consider whether a similar requirement is imposed upon opposite-sex spouses, consistent with the President’s intention that same-sex domestic partners be treated in the same manner as opposite-sex spouses for purposes of these benefits, to the extent permitted by law.
Yes, OPM proposed amendments to its regulations found at 5 C.F.R. §§ 550.401-409 to make it clear that same-sex domestic partners and the children of same sex-domestic partners are considered to be dependents for the purposes of the evacuation pay statutes. See Final Federal Register Rule, Change in Definitions; Evacuation Pay and the Separate Maintenance Allowance at Johnston Island, July 20, 2012. https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2012/07/20/2012-17540/change-in-definitions-evacuation-pay-and-the-separate-maintenance-allowance-at-johnston-island
There was an unexpected error when performing your action.
Your error has been logged and the appropriate people notified. You may close this message and try your command again, perhaps after refreshing the page. If you continue to experience issues, please notify the site administrator.