Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
On Friday August 21, 2005, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management sent a message that OPM was in litigation and it was possible that OPM could have been enjoined (stopped) from the printing or distribution of the 2005 CFC brochures.
OPM asked that if your campaign has not yet printed the 2005 brochure, that you hold off on its printing until further notice. OPM further advised that if you had already begun the process of printing, to let that process continue.
This message is to bring you up to date on the status of that litigation. OPM and the Make-A-Wish Foundation of America (MAWFA) have settled the pending litigation, with the settlement being approved by the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. A copy of the Settlement and the district court's Order are attached to this message.
As you can see from the attached Order, the following options must be implemented by all campaigns depending on the stage of the brochure printing process:
What is intended by the phrase "direct contribution" is a contribution by cash or check. The insert may be done before the brochures are sent to the agency key workers or by key workers before distribution to Federal employees.
We also ask that each campaign keep track, to the extent you are able to do so, of any additional costs to the local campaign from this printing/errata sheet process and report that data to OPM when the printing and distribution process has been concluded. We anticipate that a portion of those expenses may be reimbursed to the campaigns.
OPM appreciates the added burden this places on local campaigns at this critical time in the process, but the litigation was resolved by mutual agreement of the parties, in part to avoid protracted litigation that could have had a longer term impact on the administration of the 2005 CFC.
Please let us know immediately if you have any questions regarding these instructions only. OPM is unable to provide additional details about any aspect of the settlement other than what has been provided. Thank you for your cooperation on this important matter.
Back to Top