Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The current focus of the Government on good management, driven by both the President and Congress, is unprecedented. Greater attention is being paid to efficient and economic delivery of services to the American public.
Both the President and Congress recognize the Federal workforce is central to the delivery of services to the American public. People are the key to mission accomplishment. Consistent with the leadership of the President and Congress, the American people continue to expect more from Government, and the Government is responding.
The Federal Workforce Flexibility Act of 2004 added even more strategies to support this change. Over time, the principles and performance expectations behind these new systems, still firmly grounded in merit system principles, will expand to the rest of the Civil Service. The underlying expectation for all these changes is strategic human capital management will ensure agency mission requirements drive all human resource activity and all agency staff contribute directly to achieving agency results and are rewarded accordingly.
The need for strategic human capital management, with its emphasis on achieving results, is part of a continuing evolution of traditional human resources management (HRM) practices in Government.
The Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework (HCAAF) Resource Center is a comprehensive collection of strategies, tools, and methods for agencies to use as they build this new world. The Resource Center is an electronic Practitioners’ Guide, based on the HCAAF, a road map for human capital transformation. The HCAAF evolved from a set of Human Capital standards, issued by the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) in 2002, which were developed through a collaborative effort among OPM, the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), and the Government Accountability Office (GAO).
The HCAAF Practitioners’ Guide is intended to accelerate Governmentwide efforts to support agency mission results with strong human capital strategies. When used as a comprehensive standard for human capital results, human resources (HR) programs, and merit system compliance, the Guide serves as the basis for agency strategic human capital management accountability systems that meet OPM requirements.
You can access an electronic copy of the HCAAF Practitioners’ Guide through the Resources Index on the main menu.
The start of the 21st century is a pivotal time for the Federal human resources management (HRM) function. Cost pressures, increased attention to customer satisfaction, and emphasis on recruitment, retention, and productivity all serve to heighten awareness and scrutiny of the significant role HRM plays in advancing the mission of Federal agencies.
The implications of these escalating pressures on HRM as a profession have caused a fundamental re-thinking of the ways in which Federal HRM offices do business. This segment presents an overview of the following most significant trends driving changes in the Federal HRM environment and the case for strategic human capital management.
The trends impacting the Federal HRM environment point to the need for the Government to re-envision and clarify the HR role and to articulate its expectations for individuals serving in this role.
The American public is demanding all segments of Government demonstrate accountability for specific outcomes. Managers and supervisors are increasingly under pressure to align the work of the organization more closely with mission objectives and to establish the business cases for all expenditures.
Over time, several initiatives have evolved to address the need for accountability and results. Each initiative builds on its predecessor and further delineates the requirements for achieving accountability and results.
As agencies meet Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 (GPRA) requirements, HR offices have assumed a critical advisory role in helping management plan, develop, organize, guide, and evaluate mission-oriented programs. This role involves describing how HR management and development will contribute to achieving strategic goals and objectives.
OPM recognizes agency leaders are responsible for strategic human capital management and is leading the Government’s initiative to help agencies be successful in that endeavor.
The Chief Human Capital Officers Act of 2002 (CHCO Act) established CHCOs who advise and assist agency leaders in carrying out their responsibilities to select, develop, train, and manage a high-quality, productive workforce in accordance with merit system principles.
To implement the legislative provisions related to executive performance and accountability, OPM published amendments to 5 CFR 430 in July 2004. The amendments require agencies to obtain certification of appraisal systems covering executives. Under certified systems, the performance expectations for executives reflect their responsibility for organizational performance. Subordinate employees’ performance expectations must also reflect relevant program performance measures.
OPM, OMB, and GAO have collaborated to develop human capital systems, and OPM has created the Human Capital Assessment and Accountability Framework (HCAAF) to guide agencies toward implementing these systems.
Implications for Strategic Alignment
The need for increasing accountability and results requires HRM practices and programs be strategically aligned with the organization's mission requirements and:
Back to Top
Nationwide, there is a critical shortage of skilled workers in some occupations and geographic areas. Recruiting for highly technical occupations can be difficult. Employees with these high-demand skills can often choose from multiple employment offers and take advantage of their marketability to negotiate for flexibility, telework, and other desirable benefits.
In the face of increased competition for the same talent, the Government will be challenged to become an employer of choice and remain a competitive alternative to attract the skilled and talented workforce it needs to serve the American people. Often those who leave Government service have the most experience and expertise, resulting in a dramatic loss of capacity.
Implications for Recruitment and Retention
The increased competition for talent means Federal agencies:
Today, in the majority of American families with two parents and school-aged children, both parents work outside the home. Many American families are headed by single parents, and more than half of all mothers with children under age 3 work. Baby boomers are described as the “sandwich” generation, simultaneously caring for aging parents and dependent children. The youngest members of the workforce often juggle work and school obligations.
As the number of dual wage earners and the number of families with single parents grow, workers’ stress levels go up while their capacity to manage all of their responsibilities goes down. A reality of today’s economy is most Americans constantly need to balance the demands of their work and non-work lives.
Studies of American workers confirm working people increasingly look for employers who offer flexible and family friendly workplaces. Virtual offices, flextime, family leave, telecommuting, and other innovative work arrangements reflect employers’ creative attempts to retain valuable employees who seek to find a balance between work and family life.
In addition, employees are not content just earning a good salary but are also looking for personal satisfaction and meaning in their work. Employees expect to be recognized quickly for the contributions they make on the job. Employees expect to receive opportunities for lifelong learning, which equips them with skills necessary to keep up with rapid change and helps them prepare for the potential of multiple career changes.
Implications for Flexible and Positive Workplace Environment
To meet these changing values and expectations and become an employer of choice, Federal agencies must:
Because the management of human resources is becoming a strategic function, line managers are increasingly held accountable for directly delivering some HRM services. As line managers assume more hands on responsibility for managing all aspects of the workforce, human capital practitioners’ roles will also shift to increasingly complex roles such as business strategic partner, employee champion, and change agent.
Implications for Transformation of HR
The shift in roles requires:
Human resources management has evolved over the years from more traditional models of HRM and personnel to strategically positioned human capital management. This evolution links HR programs and practices to organizational business strategy and mission.
Traditional personnel management services are only one part of an evolutionary chain that includes a shift away from a primary focus on technical skills and transactions to a more strategic focus that aligns human capital and business needs. Practitioners of traditional HR are being asked to expand their services and expertise to support a focus on the strategic management of human capital.
Even what we have traditionally called this profession is transitioning. We have moved from the title “Personnel Management Specialist” to “Human Resources Management Specialist.” Now we are beginning to accept the term “Human Capital Practitioner” to reflect the focus on strategic human capital management, a focus that requires a direct line of sight to the agency’s strategic goals.
These human capital practitioners are increasingly called upon to understand their clients’ mission and business strategy. Instead of applying “one size fits all” HR solutions, human capital practitioners need to select and tailor programs and practices to build the organizational competencies and workplace environment their specific organization’s strategy requires to succeed.
Moreover, the increased delegation of human resources authorities to line managers means human capital practitioners and line managers now share accountability for the success of human capital management and must work more collaboratively to achieve it.
There has been an evolutionary progression from “Personnel” to “Human Resources” to “Human Capital” that can be depicted in terms of focus, strategies, and products and services that has led to success during each phase. View a model that depicts the phases of human capital evolution.
The evolution of strategic human capital management is cumulative; the evolutionary phases build on each other. View a model that depicts the cumulative nature of the evolution of strategic human capital management.
Strategic human capital management focuses on results aligned with mission and strategy, not processes. It places the right people in the right jobs at the right time to most effectively perform the work of the organization and has become a focal point of Federal agencies.
This resource center provides information for human capital practitioners and line managers/supervisors and senior leaders throughout the Federal Government to use in strategically managing human capital in compliance with merit system principles. For the purpose of this resource center, human capital practitioners are those persons who help agencies implement and achieve strategic human capital management in compliance with merit system principles.