Review the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
Your letter to Senator Edward M. Kennedy has been forwarded to
the Office of Personnel Management (OPM) for response. As explained
in your letter to Senator Kennedy, you have filed an administrative
appeal that is currently pending before an administrative judge of
the Merit Systems Protection Board.
In order to respond to your letter, I have obtained figures from
both the Office of Regional Counsel of the [agency] in [city] and
OPM's Retirement and Insurance Service concerning the deductions
that would need to be taken from your back pay award. These figures
are as follows:
BACK PAY WORKSHEET
NET BACKPAY $.00
Based on these figures, if you were to receive a back pay award
from the [agency], it would result in your having substantial
indebtednesses, including a debt to OPM as the administrator of the
Civil Service Retirement and Disability Fund for that portion of
the "Erroneous Retirement Annuity" benefits that would not be
offset by the "Adjusted Gross Back Pay" amount, $19,323.56
[$45,551.00 less $26,227.44].
While you would be entitled to request that OPM waive repayment
of this portion of the "Erroneous Retirement Annuity" benefits, a
waiver would only be granted if you were able to establish that
recovery would cause financial hardship or if you could establish
that there had been detrimental reliance. See 5 U.S.C. 8346(b); 5
C.F.R. 831.1401; Day v. OPM, 873 F.2d 291
(Fed. Cir. 1989); Metcalf v. OPM, 73 M.S.P.R. 211
(1997); and Harris v. Department of Agriculture,
50 M.S.P.R. 686 (1991).
It cannot be emphasized too strongly that whenever an individual
is entitled to back pay, the law requires that certain legitimate
deductions be taken. OPM has no choice in this matter. I hope that
this information will be of some assistance to you.
Murray M. Meeker