The Federal Government will Become America's Model Employer for the 21st Century.
Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People.
Find out more about Federal compensation throughout your career and around the world.
Staffing to align with your agency's mission
Review the Federal Employees Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
OPM’s Human Resources Solutions organization can help your agency answer this critically important question.
Developing senior leaders in the U.S. Government through Leadership for a Democratic Society, Custom Programs and Interagency Courses.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
OPM Contact: Murray M. Meeker
The claimant, an employee with the [xxx], seeks restoration of 28.2 hours of annual leave which he forfeited at the end of the 1999 leave year. For the reasons discussed herein, the claim is denied.
As explained by the claimant, 1999 was an exceptional year for [xxx]. Indeed, the claimant reported that in December 1999, he and many other [xxx] employees worked 60-hour workweeks, and that toward the end of 1999, there was a [xxx] which resulted in the cancellation of all annual leave for [xxx] employees. The claimant acknowledges, however, that he did not schedule his leave until after the start of the third biweekly pay period prior to the end of the 1999 leave year. See 5 C.F.R. 630.308(a). Having failed to schedule his leave prior to the regulatory deadline, the claimant's forfeited leave may not be restored. See William K. Knotts, B-248232, September 22, 1992. The scheduling requirement may not be waived or modified even though extenuating circumstances may have been present. See George H. Mikos, B-245117, January 21, 1992.
This settlement is final. No further administrative review is available within the Office of Personnel Management. Nothing in this settlement limits the employee's right to bring an action in an appropriate United States Court.