The Federal Government will Become America's Model Employer for the 21st Century.
Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People.
Review the new 2014 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Congress approved a cost of living increase for Federal retirees.
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
OPM’s Human Resources Solutions organization can help your agency answer this critically important question.
Developing senior leaders in the U.S. Government through Leadership for a Democratic Society, Custom Programs and Interagency Courses.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
Federal agencies cannot afford employees who are performing their duties less than fully successfully. Governmentwide regulations recommend that agencies provide assistance whenever performance becomes marginally successful. However, unlike the regulations for dealing with employees who are Unacceptable, the regulations do not specify what should be done for marginal performers. Some agencies have formal processes that supervisors must follow for assisting marginal performers. Other agencies use an informal process. This article reviews reasons for addressing marginal performance and provides tips for supervisors who want to help marginal performers improve.
Good supervisors do not allow marginal performance to continue, for these reasons:
Here are a few tips for assisting marginal performers. In addition to following these tips, supervisors should also remember to check with their Human Resources Office to see if their agency has a formal process for addressing marginal performance.
The major reason supervisors give for not dealing with Unacceptable performance is that the required process is too difficult. If supervisors assist employees who are struggling before they reach the Unacceptable level, they can spend their time more effectively by refocusing good performers rather than completing the formal process of removing Unacceptable performers.