Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
When OPM deregulated performance management in 1995, we gave agencies as much flexibility as possible to use available tools and technology. Current regulations make it possible to develop a performance management program that would allow everything from plan establishment and progress reviews to the actual appraisal of performance to be recorded electronically.
OPM's electronic signature requirements for performance appraisals are similar to those included in The Guide to Processing Personnel Actions for SF 50/52's and NIST FIPS 113. You can find the OPM requirements for SF 50/52's in chapter 3 of The Guide to Processing Personnel Actions. The requirements dealing specifically with electronic signatures are:
Congress established the Computer Security Act of 1987, which mandated that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) should establish minimum acceptable practices for the security and privacy of sensitive information stored in Federal computer systems. Of course, as with any sensitive document, an agency must take appropriate measures to ensure the security of the performance appraisals and the privacy of the individuals involved. GSA regulations include additional information on the storage and maintenance of electronic records. (These regulations are located in section 201-45.2 of title 41, Code of Federal Regulations.)
The NIST Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 113, which is available online at http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/pubs/fip113.htm, includes information on the establishment and use of authentification codes. These codes are unique to individuals and ensure that the document was "signed" by the appropriate person.
As early as 1951, the Federal Government recognized that a signature did not have to be handwritten and that "any symbol adopted as one's signature when affixed with his knowledge and consent is a binding and legal signature." (Comptroller General (CG) Decision B- 104590, September 12, 1951.)
Although not directly related, another very important CG decision affects the ability to use electronic signatures in performance management processes. In 1991, NIST asked for a decision regarding whether or not Federal agencies could use Electronic Data Interchange technologies to create valid contractual obligations that can be recorded consistent with the documentary evidence requirement for Government obligations. In a CG decision (B-245714 dated December 13, 1991), the CG concluded that valid obligations could be made using computer technology. The results of this decision regarding contracts also can be applied to valid performance plans and appraisals.
Although excited about the possibilities offered by a "paperless" appraisal process, we remind appraisal program designers that: