The Federal Government will Become America's Model Employer for the 21st Century.
Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People.
Review the new 2014 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
OPM’s Human Resources Solutions organization can help your agency answer this critically important question.
Developing senior leaders in the U.S. Government through Leadership for a Democratic Society, Custom Programs and Interagency Courses.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
OPM Contact: Murray M. Meeker
The [agency] has requested an opinion concerning its authority
to grant retroactive promotions and back pay to an [agency]
employee who, because of erroneous information provided by an
[agency] official, was not promoted on an earlier date.(1) The
request is denied.
While the [agency's] request letter states that there are no
Comptroller General decisions that are completely on point, these
decisions do clearly establish that retroactive pay actions may
only be granted where the erroneous action was contrary to statute,
regulation, or a nondiscretionary agency policy. See 63 Comp. Gen.
417 (1984) and the decisions cited therein.
The [agency's] request letter acknowledges that the delay that
resulted from the erroneous information occurred prior to the
approval of the employee's promotion by an authorized agency
official. See Barbara W. Scheaffer, B-200717,
January 28, 1981. It is not enough that an action would have been
taken but for an administrative error or that an action was
inequitable. See 58 Comp. Gen. 59 (1978) and Janice
Levy, B-190408, December 21, 1977. Additionally, it is not
sufficient for the purpose of determining whether there is
authority to grant a retroactive promotion or back pay that an
agency official misinterpreted the applicable law. See B-168715,
January 22, 1970.
This settlement is final. No further administrative review is
available within OPM. Nothing in this settlement limits the
employee's right to bring an action in an appropriate United States
This decision is being issued pursuant to our authority under 31
U.S.C. 3529 to issue advance decisions to agencies on matters
involving compensation and leave.