This article explains goal setting competencies and provides tips on how to achieve the best results.
Supervisors need to communicate organizational goals and how they link to individual and work group per-formance in order to energize their employees to accom-plish desired results. While developing performance plans, supervisors and employees can talk about how employee accomplishments support organizational goals. By aligning employee performance with organizational goals, supervisors direct their employees' efforts toward maximizing accomplishments and supporting the agency's strategic plans.
Once the supervisor and employees make these connec-tions, they can agree upon more specific, individual goals and can analyze individual responsibilities. Without the employee's agreement to perform at a certain level, it is very difficult to meet or exceed established goals.
In their book, Goal Setting: A Motivational Technique That Works, Edwin A. Locke and Gary P. Latham propose seven steps for effectively setting individual goals:
Goals have a directive effect on an individual's thoughts and actions. A goal focuses a person's attention on goal-related factors. It also regulates a person's energy expenditure. Setting hard goals increases an individual's persistence and thus transfers effort into commitment and motivation. This ultimately leads to increased performance, especially if the goals are set at a high level and are accepted by employees.
According to Lynn Summers and Elizabeth Hampson in their article published by Performaworks, Setting and Attaining Goals: How to ACT BEST, supervisors need to be skillful at setting goals successfully. In addition to the steps listed above, these authors say that supervisors should be able to:
Goal setting can have far-reaching consequences for the organization and its employees. Summers and Hampson cite recent research that reports that productivity has increased an average of 39 percent in organizations that practice systematic goal setting. Of those organizations, productivity actually increased by 57 percent when goal setting was supported by top management. In contrast, productivity increased only 6 percent in organizations with little top management support.