Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
Dear Mr. [xxx]:
This replies to your January 27, 1997 letter appealing our settlement dismissing your request to restore 11 days in which you were in a nonwork status during 1977 and 1978. We dismissed your claim on the grounds that we may not settle claims that have not been presented to our office within six years of the date the claim accrued. In your appeal, you note that, if your service computation date is adjusted to credit you for those 11 days, you would have moved from the 6-hour leave category to the 8-hour category one pay period earlier than you actually did in May, 1991. You assert that your claim for those two hours is not time barred.
We agree that your claim for two additional hours of annual leave that you allege accrued in May, 1991 is not time barred. However, that does not mean it is payable. The underlying issue in your claim is whether your service in 1977 and 1978, when you served under an intermittent appointment, should be credited as full-time employment. The record is not sufficient for us to make that determination. Therefore, you must first submit your claim to the agency for their review and determination. If the agency denies your claim, you then may appeal to this office. Your appeal should include the agency's report and any records that substantiate your claim.
Very truly yours,
Paul Britner Senior Attorney