Find out more about Federal compensation throughout your career and around the world.
Staffing to align with your agency's mission
Review the new 2014 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Congress approved a cost of living increase for Federal retirees.
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
OPM Contact: Murray M. Meeker
This responds to a request from the [agency].* By letter dated September 3, 1997, the
[agency] asked whether back pay could be paid to an employee for an
overlong assignment in which the employee performed duties at a
higher grade level.
The agency reported that the employee had already been paid for
the maximum 120 day period of a temporary promotion, but asks
whether there is authority to pay the employee for the period when
the employee was still performing duties at a higher grade level,
but after the temporary promotion had expired. While the employee
was properly paid for the period of the temporary promotion
[see 61 Comp. Gen. 492 (1982) and Kenneth Fenner,
B-183937, June 23, 1977], the agency is advised that there is no
authority to pay the employee beyond the 120 day period of the
temporary promotion. See Evelyn O. Cheeseboro,
B-217830, August 29, 1985, and Joseph C. Schrage,
B-181843, November 19, 1974. The circumstances are comparable to
instances where an employee's position is misclassified.
See Erlyn D. Felder, B-202685, August 17, 1982.
It is well settled that employees are not entitled to back pay for
periods of misclassification. 5 U.S.C. 5596(b)(3).
*This decision is being issued
pursuant to our authority under 31 U.S.C. 3529 to issue advance
decisions to agencies on matters involving compensation and