The Federal Government will Become America's Model Employer for the 21st Century.
Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People.
Review the new 2014 Federal Employees' Group Life Insurance (FEGLI) Handbook
Answering your questions about Healthcare and Insurance
Manage your retirement online.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
OPM’s Human Resources Solutions organization can help your agency answer this critically important question.
Developing senior leaders in the U.S. Government through Leadership for a Democratic Society, Custom Programs and Interagency Courses.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
The content available is no longer being updated and as a result you may encounter hyperlinks which no longer function. You should also bear in mind that this content may contain text and references which are no longer applicable as a result of changes in law, regulation and/or administration.
OPM Contact: Jo-Ann Chabot
The claimant, a civilian employee of the [agency] who works overseas, has submitted a claim for a living quarters allowance (LQA). The claim is denied for the reasons stated below.
The claimant separated from military service with the [agency] on January 31, 1995, while he was stationed overseas. On June 29, 1998, the [agency] appointed him to an overseas position under a Veterans' Readjustment Appointment. Between January 1995 and June 1998, the claimant remained overseas, applying for and receiving veterans' disability benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA). The claimant reports that the DVA found that he had a service-connected disability and was qualified to receive vocational rehabilitation. He also reports that he participated in the overseas study programs of two American universities and, as a full-time student, received a subsistence allowance from the DVA. The claimant completed his university studies in May 1998 and received a Bachelor of Science degree. On April 29, 1999, the [agency] denied the claimant's request for an LQA because his circumstances did not fulfill the requirements in Department of Defense (DoD) regulation, 1400.25-M, subchapter 1250, paragraph E 1a (2)(a).
Under section 031.12 of the Department of State's Standardized Regulations (DSSR), LQAs may be granted to an employee who is recruited outside the United States to fill overseas positions when: (1) the employee's residence overseas is attributable to his employment by the United States Government; and (2) prior to the current appointment, the employee previously had been continuously employed by the United States Government or other specified organizations under conditions providing for the employee's return transportation to the United States. DoD regulation, 1400.25-M, subchapter 1250, paragraph E 1a (2)(a), specifies that, under DSSR section 031.12(b), service members and civilian employees shall be considered to have substantially continuous employment for up to one year from the date of separation or when transportation entitlement is lost, or until the retired or separated member uses any portion of the entitlement for government transportation back to the United States, whichever occurs first.
The claimant's separation from military service occurred on January 31, 1995 and he was not appointed to a civilian position with the United States Government until June 29, 1998. Under the DoD regulation, his period of "substantially continuous service" expired on January 31, 1996. In view of this, the claimant is not entitled to an LQA. Therefore, the [agency's] decision of April 29, 1999 regarding the claimant's entitlement to an LQA is affirmed and the claim for an LQA is denied.
This settlement is final. No further administrative review is available within the Office of Personnel Management. Nothing in this settlement limits the claimant's right to bring an action in an appropriate United States Court.