Washington, DC
U.S. Office of Personnel Management
Fair Labor Standards Act Decision
Under section 204(f) of title 29, United States Code
Office of the U.S. Attorney
Southern District of Indiana
U.S. Department of Justice
Indianapolis, Indiana
Robert D. Hendler
Classification and Pay Claims
Program Manager
Merit System Audit and Compliance
11/18/2011
Date
As provided in section 551.708 of title 5, Code of Federal Regulations (
Introduction
On September 14, 2011, the U.S. Office of Personnel Management’s (OPM) Merit System Audit and Compliance received a “Complaint of Grievance - Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)” from Ms. Brenda K. Anderson. We have accepted and decided this claim under Section 4(f) of the FLSA of 1938, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 204(f)).
In reaching our FLSA decision, we have carefully considered all information furnished by the claimant.
Jurisdiction
The claimant asserts the FLSA was violated by her receipt of an email from a co-worker in which the co-worker “made defamatory, harassing remarks concerning a work procedure…” As a remedy, the claimant seeks: (1) to be assigned only bankruptcy work with minimal other duties, (2) a three-day suspension without pay for the co-worker who sent the email and that it be made a permanent record in her official personnel file, (3) a written apology from the co-worker, and (4) “damages for the maximum allowable monetary amount available for a federal employee with over 22 years of service.”
As stated in 5
Provides minimum wage standards for both wages and overtime entitlements, and administrative procedures by which covered worktime must be compensated. Included in the Act are provisions related to child labor, equal pay, and portal-to-portal activities.
Under the provisions of 29 U.S.C. § 204(f), OPM has established an administrative claims process. Under 5
The FLSA does not cover or provide for changing a Federal civilian employee’s job duties, suspending co-workers, demanding apologies, or awarding monetary damages other than for correcting FLSA minimum wage and overtime pay violations. Therefore, OPM does not consider the issues raised by the claimant or the remedies the claimant seeks within the context of the FLSA claims adjudication function it performs under 29 U.S.C. § 204(f).
Decision
The claim is denied based on lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.