The Federal Government will Become America's Model Employer for the 21st Century.
Recruit, Retain and Honor a World-Class Workforce to Serve the American People.
Human Resources and Security Specialists should use this tool to determine the correct investigation level for any covered position within the U.S. Federal Government.
OPM’s Human Resources Solutions organization can help your agency answer this critically important question.
Developing senior leaders in the U.S. Government through Leadership for a Democratic Society, Custom Programs and Interagency Courses.
Visit this federal site to search for our regulatory notices, proposed and final rules.
See the latest tweets on our Twitter feed, like our Facebook pages, watch our YouTube videos, and page through our Flickr photos.
Work sample tests require applicants to perform tasks or work activities that mirror the tasks employees perform on the job. For instance, applicants for an Administrative Assistant position may be asked to transcribe an internal memo using a word processor or to accurately file a stack of paperwork. Because work samples require applicants to perform tasks identical or highly similar to tasks from the job, great care is taken in trying to mimic the work environment to the greatest extent possible. For example, applicants to the Administrative Assistant position may perform tasks at a workstation highly similar, if not identical, to that found on the job. As with job knowledge tests, work sample tests should only be used in situations where applicants are expected to possess the required competencies upon entry into the position. If training on how to perform the work activities will be provided after selection, the work sample method may not be appropriate.
In addition to work samples, which attempt to re-create specific work scenarios, performance tests can also be designed to mirror very broad aspects of the job that may draw on fundamental competencies needed to perform a wide range of job tasks. For example, the Administrative Assistant position mentioned above may require individuals to routinely find specific materials to answer various questions posed by upset or hostile customers. Rather than re-create a large number of scenarios to cover a wide array of situations, employers may design a single exercise to measure the general competencies in question (e.g., an interactive role-play between the applicant and a well-trained actor that measures applicant's problem solving, communication, and interpersonal skills). Applicant scores on work sample tests are generated by trained assessors who observe the applicant's behavior and/or by measuring task outcomes (e.g., the degree of interpersonal skills demonstrated or the number of errors made in transcribing an internal memo).
(See Section VI for a summary of each article)
Campion, J. E. (1972). Work sampling for personnel selection. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(1), 40-44.
Gilliland, S. W. (1995). Fairness from the applicants' perspective: Reactions to employee selection procedures. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 3(1), 11-19.
Lance, C. E., Johnson, C. D., Douthitt, S. S., Bennett, W., & Harville, D. L. (2000). Good news: Work sample administrators' global performance judgments are (about) as valid as we've suspected. Human Performance, 13(3), 253-277.
Robertson, I. T. & Kandola, R. S. (1982). Work sample tests: Validity, adverse impact and applicant reaction. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55(3), 171-183.
Schmidt, F. L. & Hunter, J. E. (1998). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 85 years of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 124(2), 262-274.
The Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology (SIOP) website contains information on Work Samples and Situations.
Back to Top